Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Tweeting the March 2013 UNA Board meeting

Here are my tweets from the March 12, 2013 UNA Board meeting.  Please remember - these are tweets (not corrected for spelling, grammar, etc) and are my own personal comments!  Enjoy :)  

Oh, to read in order of tweet, scroll to the bottom and read up.

Tweets

  1. Nicely tweeted See you next time :)
  2. Meeting adjourns with the announcement of Shaohong Wu's resignation from the board due to moving off campus.
  3. UNA Board member Shaohong Wu is leaving in April to move to Richmond
  4. Discussion of traffic management plans in relation to UHS. 1 suggestion would be to anchor upturned tricycles in the middle of the street.
  5. Great afternoon run with Anth RUnning Club at 3pm today - 9km @ 5:30min/km ave pace. No rain, good conversations.
  6. Majority of board vote to double tax residents in Hawthorn Place. Residents now must pay for visitor permit. I voted against the fees.
  7. Motion carries with one vote against
  8. UNA will now charge an escalating 10 month renewable fee for on-street parking. 40 1st car, 80 2nd car, 160 3rd car per legal suite.
  9. Parking fees approved with one vote against - guess who )
  10. However, the UBC led developments are the cause. Rather than eternalizing the cost of development, UBC should absorb the costs.
  11. Knight says should Hawthorn used to be a parking lot; we should look forward instead to solutions not try to find cause to problem.
  12. Knight suggests my comment on double taxation incorrect and UBC has not created the problem.
  13. Frank says parking is subsidized and shouldn't be.
  14. Parking issues are really being caused by UBC development and self-centred greenwash campaign.
  15. Menzies says UNA residents already pay too much in taxes and shouldn't have to pay for street parking.
  16. Double taxation now taking place. Fees for parking are not appropriate.
  17. Now a motion to approve fees to park on the street in UNA neighbourhoods
  18. Parking proposal with fees now up for discussion.
  19. Proposal to rename a unnamed lane in honour of the late Bruce Todd and so recommend to the UBC naming committee.
  20. not recording seconder,. Mover is recorded unless concern over safety of mover.
  21. Now, a motion on UNA record keeping. Changes include destroying voice recordings of meetings after minutes are approved.
  22. Harris engages in a tete a tete with Frank - report going a bit off track. Maybe that part would be better in the cafe later over coffee.
  23. Maria Harris giving her electoral area A report - focus on rapid transit issues.
  24. Wall of skyscrappers rising along Pacific Spirit Park @ UBC
  25. C&CP moves 2ward Manhattanization ubc with Lot 6 permit development which will put 22 stories into the air alongside Pacific Spirit Pk
  26. Margaret Eckenfelder, UBC-C&CP presenting now.
  27. Speakers finished and now moving back to agenda. If more speakers turn up at 6:30 we'll hear them as well.
  28. Round points (round abouts) are in fact safer than regular four way intersections.
  29. The Hampton Place resident says increased traffic would create too much noise and make pedestrian crossings more dangerous.
  30. Griffiths asks board to stop highway developments - but UNA can't do anythig; it's . Note: round points are safer.
  31. Parking and traffic is a big concern with UBC's massive ramping up of density in south campus . money B4 safety?
  32. Griffith is shocked by the proposed crossing at the four lane highway!
  33. Cathy Griffiths speaking about pedestrian controlled crosswalk & road at 16th across from Hampton Place
  34. Pritchard concludes that parking decal charge denies the original concepts for the area..
  35. Up first, a UNA resident addresses the board about parking on campus.
  36. Pritchard states inconsistent in parking planning; parking plan is a reduction of resident benefits.
  37. Pritchard notes the ongoing reduction of resident parking in UNA area & ill effect of UBC Athletics ramping up of their facilities
  38. We're at tonight's meeting.
  39. Chair allows Mr Pritchard to speak to the meeting about proposed parking management plan
  40. Fred Pritchard stands up from floor to ask that delegates be allowed to speak before the meeting, not toward the end of meeting
  41. Tweeting from the monthly board meeting today @

Wednesday, March 6, 2013

When it's not really about a name

I recently received a telephone call from Vancouver Courier news reporter Cheryl Rossi asking me about the naming of the new VSB school.  You will, I trust, be able to read her article sometime in the next few days. [You can find her story here.  I appreciate the sensitive and balanced approach she took to this issue]

I felt saddened by the line of questions because it was focused upon the process and the nature of my role in the process.  I would have rather spoken about the wonderful women that was Rose Point.  At first I tried to say nothing and asked to end the conversation.  The reporter was good at her job and kept going.  I hope that my responses honour the principles of respect that I try to follow.  I really don't want to engage in a back and forth who said what, who did what.  That, to me, will diminish the possibility of this very potentially historic opportunity of naming a school.

After thinking about the issue I called the reporter back to try and explain why I think debating the process misses the point of this issue.  But I don't think I was effective.  I'm not interested in trying to respond point by point to things the reporter is attributing to the Acadia School PAC Chair.  


Here's the gist of what I wanted to say.
First, I really work hard to avoid personal attacks or criticisms of individuals. I don't always succeed, but I do try. It seems counter productive to me.  I work professionally in an area of study where I am witness to much harm and dysfunction and thus I find it very important to try and avoid personal attacks.
Second, I have clear and well defined perspectives on many issues.  I am also quick to apologize without condition when I make a mistake. 
Third I believe it to be my civil duty to be involved in my community.  As a parent from about 1998-2009 I was involved in school PAC’s Jules Quesnel, Queen Elizabeth, Kitsilano, Churchill, and U Hill Secondary.  I also was a DPAC exec for about 6 years (from about 2003-2009).  I was involved in getting the University Neighbourhoods Association to set up a school action committee and worked with a range of local folks to lobby and advocate for our children in this area.  In all of these things what you see is what you get – an involved, hardworking person, who cares.  As a parent advocate I saw my role as advancing the well-being of all children, not just my own children, through my involvement.  I was involved with the S.O.S. Movement in 2001-2002 (and beyond) to work to ensure that all children could get a good education. 
Fourth I advocate and try to follow a radical democratic practice of openness.  You can see my longstanding campaign for real local government in the UBC area as published on my blog and that concern is what propelled me to run for elected office here for the UNA last fall.

In terms of the specific issue here I have tried to be clear to the people that I know, work with, and speak with (these folks don’t normally include journalists) where I stand and what I think.  Some family and friends might suggest I am too free with my perspective.  


I don’t believe that I am the first person who thought that Rose Point would be an appropriate choice for a school name.  I do know that I was the first to go and visit with the family to ask for their permission to suggest to people that Rose’s name be placed on a VSB School.  

I spoke with the Point family at Musqueam in the last week of November to ask for their blessing.  On November 23rd I posted a notice of the school naming process (one this blog) and expressed my hope 
“that we will be able to suggest to the School Board a name (or names) that honour the people upon whose lands our new school is being built and all the people who have worked to make education possible and meaningful throughout our great province!” 
And then, after having spoken with the family, posted a note about the issue where I stated publicly 
“It would would be a powerful act of respect to place Rose Point's name upon the new K-8 school being built at UBC.”

I track the visits to my blog and note that there was a lot of increased traffic during this period of time and that it would appear that many people were reading and forwarding links to my blog around the internet. 


This is normally considered a good thing.

http://universitytown.blogspot.ca/search?updated-max=2012-12-15T16:20:00-08:00&max-results=4