The
opening lines of clause 9 of the Noise Bylaw reads as follows: “Notwithstanding
any other provision of this Bylaw the following are declared to be Noises which
are objectionable or liable to disturb the Quiet of any person and are hereby
prohibited and no person being the owner or occupant of any Premises shall
Cause.” This is followed with a
list of prohibited noises. Under
subsection 9(d) power equipment is deemed a prohibited noise “except
between 0800 hours to 1800 hours on any week day that is not a Holiday or
between the hours of 1000 hours to 1700 hours on any Saturday that is not a
Holiday.” This would seem to allow
an exception that would permit power equipment of any noise level as long as
its operation is restricted to weekdays 8am to 6pm and Saturdays 10am to
5pm. However, power equipment does
appear to be covered under the provisions of clause 10 that concerns continuous
noise.
Clause 10 stipulates that “No person shall Cause Continuous Sound the Sound Level
of which: (a) during
the Daytime exceeds a rating of 55 on an Approved Sound Meter when received at
a Point of Reception; or (b) during the Nighttime exceeds a rating of 45 on an Approved
Sound Meter when received at a Point of Reception.” This clause does not
prohibit power equipment; it does however limit the sound level of such power
equipment.
One
might argue that the “notwithstanding” used in the opening of clause 9 renders
the restriction of the sound level clause ineffective. However, it would seem to me that the
notwithstanding is in specific reference to what noises are deemed to be
prohibited, tout court. Clause 10
compliments clause 9 by qualifying the extent of disruptive sounds within the
common areas of the UNA.
Specifically clause 10 refers to Continuous Sound, “which means any Noise
occurring for a duration of more than three minutes, or occurring continually,
sporadically or erratically but totaling more than three minutes in any 15
minute period of time.”
What
this means is that we need to ensure that the landscaping contactors are apprised
of the noise bylaw and that we develop effective noise mitigation operational
rules and procedures so that our contractors can act in compliance with the
noise bylaw. At present power
equipment is operated in the UNA areas
2 comments:
This noise bylaw had better regulate all the noisy, unsupervised children in the Hawthorn Place neighbourhood.
I think that having thousands of children on a university campus is a terrible idea. It reduces the quality of student life. Once word of this gets out, UBC will no longer attract the cream of the crop.
What kind of parent crams a bunch of children into a small condo, when they could be living out in the suburbs?
Really? I can only think that the 'anonymous' commentator is making a poor attempt at levity. Can they really be serious? We'll just chalk this up to a slightly offbeat sense of humour poorly executed.
Post a Comment